re: #528 000G

Gotta expand on this a bit. The reasoning is just so deliciously insane, like a logical casu marzu:

1. Islam versus the rest of the world is a world war, according to Fjordm. A

world war!

And he said it “many times”, thus he really, really believes in it, or he is a very, very passionate propagandist. The first one would be scary on a Breivik level, the second one is just slightly less scary.

2. This supposed world war was inevitable (with the caveat “probably”) “the second we allowed Muslims to settle in our lands”. “We” = non-muslim natives, I presume. So the act of “allowing” people from other faiths to settle – not the settlement itself, mind you, but somehow making it legal – on land hitherto populated by people of non-muslim faith only made this alleged world war inevitable. Nevermind seperation of church and state and all of that.

3. So this “war” is now happening because of this allowing of muslim immigration, and I guess it can only be stopped by disallowing it, and the level of its future bloodiness can only be affected by a directly proportional number of deportations of muslims already living here. Where to? Fjordman won’t say; his half-baked genocidal fantasies kinda remind me of Helen Thomas, though.