re: #42 charlz

I’m amazed (no, not really) that she chose that to be upset about rather than the caption “She’s bad news for the GOP — and for everybody else, too”!

In real life, that’s what she’s upset about. Had the article been flattering, we wouldn’t have heard a word about it.

The photo wasn’t sexist or even objected to when it was used by Runner’s World. How did it become sexist when it hit Newsweek’s cover?

Maybe she should start inserting Byzantine restrictions on her photo rights, similar to those she enforces for her speaking engagements which make sure there is no one “hostile” in the audience, like the press. Or gay people. Or people who’ve had sex without being married.