re: #531 legalpad

…I think the key to Coulter’s decision to present it like this is based on the feelings of a certain percentage of pro-lifers. She, and they, believe, with all their heart, that the life of a fetus is exactly as valuable and worthy as the murdered doctors’. Every bit of horror felt about doctor Tiller, they feel about the unborn. So they agree with the sentiments of pro-abortionists on Tiller, and in one view Ann was genuinely trying to illustrate how his death is absolutely identical to the death of each fetus in every way.

Overlayed with that, in a mixed and variable fashion, is Ann, and a certain percentage of pro-lifers reacting to each abortion, emotionally, as if it were their own child. It is akin to the sympathy felt by all of us regarding an abused child. Needless to say, we are all quite angry with the child abuser. If we were in some country where the child abuse had been legalized, our feelings would not change. Obviously, there is a conflict within all of them as to exactly how to react to an event like this.

My overall reaction is that I understand how everyone feels. I do not believe simple condemnation of the feelings of others, however intense, and however terribly they manifest themselves will solve this problem anymore than western condemnation of Muslim-based “terrorism” solves that. The small percentage of “Muslims” and the small of percentage of “Christians” that decide to kill are out there. It is interesting to me how part of the solution for many is to try not to aggravate the Muslims. Obviously, “in-your-face” abortion of third-trimester babies is not an attempt not to aggravate pro-lifers…

I really appreciate your thoughtful and reasoned comments on a divisive subject. I definitely hear what you’re saying.

I would only add that if Ann Coulter had gone on TV and said exactly what you say above, I would have a newfound respect for her. Because, opinions aside, what you say is honest. What she says is not honest. An issue this close to the heart is only cheapened by her lame attempts at sarcasm and humor.

My only other quibble would be with your reference to “aggravating” pro-lifers. I feel pretty sure that for a woman undergoing a third-trimester abortion in Tiller’s clinic, or a similar one, “aggravating pro-lifers” is way down the list of her motivations for being there.

But you’ve given me some food for thought, and I thank you.