re: #558 Spare O’Lake

I am peaceful and secure in the honest uncertainty of my agnosticism.

If that were indeed the case, you wouldn’t be so threatened by the existence of atheists, and so determined to recategorise them as ‘agnostics’, and so determined to insist that your position is the only one that is ‘honest’.

It’s generally a mark of intellectual insecurity to be threatened by the existence of opposing points of view. It’s odd that you’re arguing for adopting a postion of uncertainty, as the only honest position, yet not being able to tolerate others who don’t share your views.

Why is it that you don’t consider the religious to be ‘dishonest’, i wonder?