re: #583 Bloodnok

I’m not sure what that is supposed to mean. In order to have a rational debate people from both sides are needed. But in this debate the people on the “other side” come armed with obfuscations and BS talking points that have been pumped into the mainstream by a well funded effort with the sole purpose of muddying the waters and making that rational debate impossible.

So you’re basically saying that first I have to agree with you, i.e. believe whomever you want me to believe, and then you are going to tell me what I need to do.

You don’t seem to be wanting debate, you seem to be wanting a choir.

re: #583 Bloodnok

When science and mathematical results are on one side the other side has no choice but to disprove those findings scientifically and mathematically. That has not happened.

It would be of little use to me. I, unlike you, am not qualified to assess either sides scientific evidence, and will simply have to rely on faith. While I am perfectly happy to do some things relying on faith, as I do every day, I am not so happy to do other things, especially things that have little to do with solving the claimed problem.