re: #590 Obdicut

Your confusion is easily resolved. He should not address creationism. That leaves the neutrality law intact, and the science lessons intact and expropriate. Once you show the science and tech it’s implications for how to continue study in these sciences the teaching job is done. There is no inherent need to get into religious beliefs. A better approach IMO.

On the possible violation-And lets remember a lower judge saw it differently. If this were so easily cut and dried we would see a consistent set of rulings on up the chain. Until some higher court refuses to hear it to let the previous ruling stand.