re: #60 Dark_Falcon

O’Reilly is correct in his analysis: Gay marriage cannot be effectively opposed on religious grounds. Modern constitutional jurisprudence (properly) does not permit barring something solely on religious grounds. If Laura Ingraham does not like this situation, then she can not like it. But as is often noted here:

Ms. Ingraham is entitled to her own opinions. She is not, however, entitled to her own facts.

The problem is the Wingnuts are still under the impression the Bible is law.