re: #57 Blue Spot Vlamingii Tang

I wish I could say different, but my level of respect for Supreme Court Justices is on a steep down slope:

Insurance is not a “product” in any normal free market sense.

It sounds like they will turn down the individual mandate, at the request of the GOP which invented the principle. So everyone better be prepared to pay more for all the individualists out there who expect their freedoms to be subsidized.

Weird, non-barbed question: Would a rule against a forced purchase of an insurance product also impact mandatory car insurance?