re: #644 RogueOne

The science doesn’t toss logic out the window. You cannot say, logically… “We don’t have all the information and we don’t fully understand all the information we do have” and then say “We’re 95% certain one input is the cause of all the warming”. That doesn’t make sense.

BTW, that doesn’t mean they’re wrong in their conclusions either, they could turn out to be 100% correct but there isn’t any way to know at this point with a 95% certainty.