re: #64 wheat-dogghazi

Was that admissible evidence? It sure makes Dunn out to have some kind of anger management issues, to say the least. That photo showing his shock at the guilty verdicts suggests that he feels he’s done nothing wrong at all — just a normal day in the life of every suburban American man, spraying bullets at cars full of teenagers. Like Grand Theft Auto, but with real bullets, real cars and real kids.

He looks like the big, beefy, dumb-looking guys they get to play big, beefy, dumb crooks on TV cop shows.

That’s a lawyer question, but I’m guessing not admissible. Don’t even want to go inside the head of a Florida prosecutor.