re: #660 Gepetto

I was just pointing out that the President is in the “baby-as-punishment” camp, so its not only “whackjobs”.

And, these days, I want to tar and feather most of our elected public servants. I believe that many of them have shown little adherence to the beneficial planks of either party, and have become more craven and quite bold in their brigandry. When the electorate becomes too focused on examples of how they’ve sold us out, the socon issue bell is rung, and we predictably retreat and howl at each other from our respective corners. Thus are we divided to the benefit of our representatives-turned-masters. Tar and feathers, public shaming, and a railride outta town is not only warranted, but may become necessary for the lot of them.

So. Are you willing to pay everytime a poor young girl becomes pregnant? That would include pre-natal, birth, and post-natal care. Then you’ll need entitlements similar to welfare. Are you willing to pay more in taxes for these services? I mean. While perhaps it could be argued that it’s not really “punishment” I assume you think it’s really easy when a poor teenager become pregnant right?