re: #671 Fairly Sure I’m Still Obdicut

But that’s just his word on it, which you’re apparently just taking at face value. Beyond selling, he might just have wanted to keep his guns with him, and thought he could get away with it going through customs. I don’t know.

If you had said we have no physical evidence or proof, sure. “No idea” really implies far less information than we have. We have one idea clearly presented. We have been shown this is not a unique incident. Maybe it’s a correct idea maybe not. But it is most certainly there.

In your view does the phrase “just taking his word for it” and pointing out this happens from time to time as shown in my links, his attorneys statements, his reported mental state, and family statements really a fair match? I think you have used an inaccurate phrase there.

Above I has said he effed up big, and you saw that as a change in my opinion.

Lastly before I try to move on to something more interesting I will remind you of my original objection. It’s not funny. Hardly an endorsement of the man or a diminishing of his mistake.