re: #61 carefulnow

Because it appears that that is what George Will and his “fact checkers” did.

But, this is what I don’t seem to understand.

Is the main issue: Whether or not the ice is increasing?

Or, is the main issue: Whether George Will uses less than accurate means, but ultimately ended up making a factual statement in the end?

I think the main issue is the 1st. Those who attacked Will used underestimated data to attack his underlying argument to then argue themselves that the ice was decreasing (which we now know isn’t true).