re: #688 RadCap

It does indeed. And the people to whom it is directed CLAIM to accept logic. I am simply pointing out that they missed a step in that acceptance. Thus the only “stunning” misunderstanding here is on the part of those who seem to think that their epistemology does not require validation.

That is the argument of faith.

Is that your argument? If not, then on what point do you claim we disagree?

Why should I listen to anything you say what involves logic in some way - ie everything you’ve said - until YOU validate it?

Is it because you don’t feel it is necessary to do this for every logical statement you make? If so, how do you differ from the guy who made that video? (Except in that you are being utterly stupid of course).