re: #57 danarchy

It’s weird, it is all based on a preprint study that got passed around. I can’t for the life of me figure out why people accept a single study with shaky findings by a single group, but not what is now one of the most studied vaccines in history, that the scientific community almost universally says is safe and effective.

I think this is what got it started:
Nature

So it looks like the code that detects phone numbers is overzealous. Can’t figure out how to get it to accept the link, but if you google:
The mechanisms of action of Ivermectin against SARS-CoV-2: An evidence-based clinical review article

the nature link will pop up.

Well, we have to remember that the MAGAt faith in HCQ started with a single French study published in a magazine owned by the doctor who conducted it, made wild claims about not only the effectiveness of the drug as a “cure” but also a prophylactic, refused to release crucial details about how it was conducted, and to this day has been totally impossible to reproduce. So this is actually par for the course.