re: #699 LotharBot

James point is perfectly good; that he’s treating the fetus as a full human is actually a concession to your side of the argument. He’s not attempting to make that argument, he’s saying “Even if we treat the fetus as though it had full human rights, there is still no ethical way to mandate that anyone give up a portion of their life to support it”.

If you don’t think that a fetus is a full human, than the case for forcing a woman to keep it becomes weaker, not stronger. He’s showing that even if it is a full human, the case is very weak.