re: #721 Dan G.

Really? Her claim that the ethics is based on theft, when the provided evidence explicitly states trade, and the fact that she has done nothing to validate her previous claim?

Dan, you are clearly taking the hyperbolic nature of my initial characterisation and freaking out. You’re wrong about Rand. You’re wrong to say I claimed her ethics is based on theft. It’s based, in part, on semi-Neitzschean ideas about the strong taking and getting and producing what they want and need, and the weak failing to do so. That is what I meant when I characterised it that way.

You have seriously failed at everything here, reading comprehension, simple civility, and you’re only digging your hole deeper— but that is exactly what I would expect from a Randian fanboi. ;)

I’d say we’re done now.