re: #61 EPR-radar

I prefer to have ‘traitor’ kept strictly to its constitutional definition. IMO, it is not helpful for both left and right to be screaming ‘traitor’ at each other. Lets have that nonsense just come from the right.

Gohmert can be criticized for what he is (e.g., drooling wing nut, or person pandering to drooling wing nuts) just fine without invoking ‘treason’.

THIS. Treason has a very specific definition. I don’t like throwing it around lightly.

Gohmert is stupid, offensive, bigoted, and quite possibly seditious. Calling him a traitor is straight out of the WingNut Drooly book, though.