re: #69 sattv4u2
That you didn’t like my “continuance of the debate” does not mean I didn’t.
You did not continue the debate. You inferred something, and…. made some jokes and sighs. We all know of Immelt, and he does have connections to Obama.
But you’re comparing that to Ailes, are you not? You’ve not furthered the comparison. You made an equivalence that sorta inferred that Immelt/Obama is the same thing.
Really, is that it? One and done?