re: #735 Liet_Kynes

Nope. I didn’t say that.

I said that it is immoral to, without warrant, cause the loss of life or limb through action or inaction.

The “without warrant” clause prevents us from acting imprudently. I also have a right to my life and limbs. The less you are dependent upon me personally for your health and welfare and the greater the action causes the loss of my life and limb, the greater the warrant that is needed for you to have claim on my life and limb.

Also by your own argument… so having someone feed off of your organs for 9 months is causing you less loss of life and limb than an abortion?

In that case how would you feel about someone living in with you and the two of you getting connected by some wries to use you as a living dialisis machine?

The process would cause danger to neither your existence or threaten you with personal injury (life and limb) with no loss of life or limb by your own rules, you have no warrant needed for someone else to lay claim to make use of your organs as well for 9 months while their’s recover.