re: #71 Targetpractice, Worst of Both Worlds

Sounds like that’s what they’re pressing. “Yeah, you can believe that evolution works, but you still have to believe that God set the path that that evolution was going to follow.”

Like I’ve always said, “intelligent design” is little more than creationism in a lab coat. A way for creationists to claim that they support science, then claim that science is wrong when it says that nature and not God is responsible for different creatures coming to be.

Thanks. That’s what I thought he was saying, but I wasn’t sure. Sounds like the same as what PLL linked to.

re: #72 ProLifeLiberal

He seems to be supporting the concept of Theistic Evolution.

I’d never heard that term until now. Sounds like intelligent design, no?