re: #63 haakondahl

Of course, you could say that this is the basis for religion as a whole, and so the flaw would naturally be repeated in the minor case. You could very well say that. I, of course, could not possibly say such a thing.

When people have asked me what I think about faith versus science, I answer “Faith’s role is to provide workable rules of thumb to cover things we don’t understand scientifically, YET. Once we do, faith needs to concede the argument.”

ID is a perfect example of why.