re: #73 Obdicut

No intent to insult, as a policy I am a strong advocate for tying spending to revenues reasonably, and ending expanding services beyond the states ability to support. I want 13 in place until spending restrictions are in place. Post 13 revenues can and have been adequate in the past. To me that diminished the anti 13 argument.

Reorganizing the way the monies are distributed is on the table as far as I’m concerned, BTW I agree with you there.