re: #6 calochortus
Once again a RWNJ fails to consider the value of nuance. Of course income inequality is a good thing at a certain level. It provides incentive, etc., etc. Massive income inequality can destroy the fabric of a society.
Hopefully, they let it all hang out in the next cycle. It might even eclipse Romney’s immortal 47% comments.
Imagine how well something like “Of course a 1000:1 income ratio is desirable. How else are the rabble to know who has God’s favor, or be motivated to improve their sorry lot?” would play.