re: #814 Sharmuta

Take it up with Judge Jones, who considered it religion, and take it up with the SCOTUS who considered religious philosophies in science class violate the Constitution.>

Ah. SCOTUS. The same organization that dictated that the black man has no rights that the white man need respect, the same organization that sentenced 50 million unborn to death since 1973 in an act of “raw judicial power.”

I for one don’t exactly look to them for political authority.

re: #806 swisnieski

Uhh, IIRC, the bill originally prohibited funding from being used for the modernization/renovation of buildings merely used by religious groups — i.e., the “substantial portion” clause was left out.

This was changed to its current reading precisely because it was regarded as being discriminatory.

*Has* it been changed? Last I heard the amendment yanking that language was voted down by the Dems. I hope to be wrong on this, but I think that language remained.