re: #60 justthefacts916

Bill O’Reilly’s argument is full contradictions. Science reports on concrete evidence. O’Reilly blatantly ignores, or does not know the process, of science. He has no journalistic integrity.

O’Reilly was very confused. He started off by saying that he “believed” in evolution, but he thought that God was the driver of it all. Then he moved on to support the idea of including ID in the classroom. His arguments were exceedingly weak, and I’m particularly annoyed that there was virtually no discussion of the new book. Mr. Dawkins Atheist said that he’d been warned that O’Reilly would shout at him.

All in all, a rather pointless discussion.