re: #73 Cineaste

I’ll certainly take a look but I’m talking more of the vast amount of written material describing the climate in Europe and Asia at the time vs. the not very vast at all written material describing the climate outside of this tiny “local” area at the time. I.e., none.

I think the main point you may have missed is that the AWG believers are doing the same thing they accuse deniers/honest skeptics of doing: cherry picking evidence and ignoring everything that doesn’t “fit”.

And don’t get me started on tree rings as a reliable proxy…