re: #76 ggt

I guess I do see it as a condemnation of terrorism in general.

I don’t understand why absolutist thinking in regards to a “No tolerance” rule regarding terrorism is wrong.

As I have pointed out, he was not talking about a no tolerance rule.

He basically said, either you’re with the US in whatever it deems fit to do in regard to terrorism, or you’re against the US. One can have no tolerance for terrorism AND be against specific measures the US undertook.