re: #51 lostlakehiker

…
Here, the choice needn’t be between war sooner and war later, because it could be that sanctions would sway the regime and convince it to stand down its nuclear arsenal ambitions. But not if we give away the store.

Clue: It’s NOT just the US in talks with Iran. How can sanctions work if Iran reaches a deal with the other countries and they remove their sanctions?

If I wanted to adopt the same rhetorical style that seems to be the fashion, I could say that the Democrats don’t just want war, they want nuclear war.

Because that’s one possibility if they’ve miscalculated.

But I know better than to fling such a hateful and unfounded accusation. They think their deal will work. Are you sure?

You don’t have the first clue what the agreement being worked entails, yet are certain the deal, being worked by NOT just the US, but by P5+1, can’t possibly result in a non-nuclear armed Iran.

The P5+1 is a group of six world powers[1] which in 2006 joined the diplomatic efforts with Iran with regard to its nuclear program.[2] The term refers to the P5 or five permanent members of the UN Security Council, namely United Kingdom, United States, Russia, China, and France, plus Germany. P5+1 is often referred to as the E3+3 (or E3/EU+3) by European countries.[3] Wikipedia

Without their help, how do you plan to accomplish anything but a war?

Are you proud of both your ignorance and your arrogance?