re: #82 Buck

I really don’t want to discuss this using what happened to you as an example.

Tough. Deal with it. Rape involves real people. I’m one of them.

That is NOT at all what I am saying. It is exactly the opposite of what I have been saying.
How can you say that I said that?

Because of your conversation with Sionann, who had sex that was statutory rape.

My understanding of what you wrote here is that:

1. A child could consent to have sex with an adult.
2. That you are sad that this consent (that comes from pure love) is the case in many cases of incest.
3. That the consent (you think is there) would not matter to the law.

Do I really have this so wrong? It really seems awfully clear to me.

And you ignore the part where I say ethics just so you can smear me, right? I mean, why else do you leave out that I say the consent doesn’t matter to ethics?

Maybe I am using the words “forced” and “violent” interchangeably. let me be very clear, yes, I think that in the context of RAPE, coercion IS always force, and that all forms of force (again as it applies to the rape of a child) is by it’s very nature, violent.

What about Sionnan, above? Do you think she was forced to have sex and violently raped?