re: #843 tradewind

SCOTUS picks should not be subject to scrutiny re their gender or sexual preference, religion or lack of it, etc.
But what bothers me about Kagan is that she’s literally never sat on a bench, she would make the SC a total hall of Harvard, and she has not one word of opinion on which to suss out her ideas on the law.
Well, except for the part about kicking the ROTC people off campus at Harvard.

If she had advanced that idea because she is anti-military, I would think that was bad. But since her reason was the unfairness of “don’t ask-don’t tell”, I think it was good (although she lost.)