re: #83 Charles

No, I’ve been extremely clear about this from the start. The deal is that you are going to PROVE that inaccurate data was produced, not simply that the processes were flawed, or that inaccurate data COULD have been produced. I’ve stated this over and over.

re: #723 Charles

OK, then go ahead and post whatever you think makes your case. I seriously doubt that you’re going to be able to show an “inaccuracy,” which is what you claimed. And quibbling over quick and dirty methods used to parse a flat file is not the same thing as demonstrating that the code produced inaccurate results.