re: #91 iceweasel

She’s obviously a liar. Because if the goal really was to protect women, the law would have been written differently— there wouldn’t have been this clause about procuring an abortion. She’s a liar and hater of women.

An abortion would in no way destroy the evidence. You could put whatever evidence there is following the abortion into evidence. The Doctor could sign medical report that they in fact did perform the abortion, and if required, DNA tests could be perfomed.
Its like telling a stabbing victim that under no circumstances can the knife be removed from their leg prior to trial as we wouldn’t want to destroy the evidence of the stabbing.