re: #908 Klaatu

“teachers shall be permitted to help students understand, analyze, critique, and review in an objective manner the scientific strengths and scientific weaknesses of theories of biological and chemical evolution.”

Funny but I thought understanding, analyzing, critiquing, and reviewing were the basis of science.

What is the problem with this? Are certain theories closed off to further analysis?

You sound like Al Gore when he says there is no debate to be had on Global Warming.

Can you provide me with a single, solitary, credible, empirical-evidence-supported example of a weakness in evolutionary theory?

I didn’t think so.