re: #931 American-African

Do you honestly believe the law enforcement official was describing a car radio receiver? honestly?

As I said in my post, we do not know. They could have only been trying to make a quick video showing how they accessed the Senators office. The mention of the receiver in my opinion suggests they intended to receive something and I choose to believe the official’s comment about a receiver meant a device that was something more than a simple radio. There is no reason to mention the individual arrested was in possession of a car stereo.

There is lot’s of stuff that “there is no reason to mention” being mentioned. Like I have been trying to point out. I do think that things are being exaggerated (like the whole “wiretapping” thing).

So if the person in the car had a walkie talkie? Would that “trouble” you?

I am pretty sure that IF the FBI had found a bug on the guys they arrested at the scene, AND a receiver for that transmitter with the accused in the car…they would have detailed that better.

So far I like my #930 as a better explanation about what they were probably doing. Still stupid, but not a felony.