re: #94 Bulworth

Notwithstanding what her actual testimony was, and notwithstanding that it would be insurers not taxpayers footing the bills, wouldn’t the relatively low cost of BC (as Hoft is aledging) mean that insurers wouldn’t be paying all that much to provide it? I’m really not understanding the anger and vitriol here in general, and that directed towards Ms. Fluke especially.

Because people like Jim Hoft thrive on fake outrages.