re: #91 recusancy

He’s not playing the race card.

Then which card is he playing?

You’re playing the Limbaugh/Sharpton race card.

You’re playing the pointless reductio ad beckam card.

Claiming victim-hood in any perceived slight. He was making a humorous statement talking about all races getting ahead.

indeed, what could be more humorous than suggesting that the other named races need to take their place as equals, and whites need to embrace what is right? Very funny.

What should he have said when he got to white? They’re already ahead. So he could have left ‘white’ out - and you therefore would be complaining about that or he could have left it in and said what he said.

Howzabout he could have taken the opportunity not to utter the nonsense in question?