Romney Booed Repeatedly During NAACP Speech

Not buying the snake oil
Politics • Views: 29,496

Mitt Romney parroted his standard right wing positions to the NAACP convention today, promising to get rid of the Affordable Care Act, and was booed by the audience several times.

After one of the most blatantly race-baiting Republican primary campaigns we’ve ever seen, is anyone surprised by this? People can tell when they’re being patronized by a liar.

Jump to bottom

50 comments
1 Kragar  Wed, Jul 11, 2012 10:49:14am

Rush said this just showed how brave Romney was, and that it was brilliant because Romney just spoke over their heads to get his real message out.

Right.

2 alinuxguru  Wed, Jul 11, 2012 10:53:22am

re: #1 Kragar

The tea party is already chumming their right wing base waters. They are now tweeting incessantly about how the NAACP may or may not have required people to show two forms of ID to see Eric Holder. *THIS* is clearly hypocritical of them denying people the right to see Holder and is *exactly* the same thing as a Constitutional Right.

4 Bulworth  Wed, Jul 11, 2012 10:54:33am

Too bad there apparently was no opportunity for conversation here. As in, “Governor, when you say you will act to repeal ‘Obamacare’, do you realize you would be making millions of workers and families uninsured once again?”

5 Kragar  Wed, Jul 11, 2012 10:56:52am

re: #4 Bulworth

Too bad there apparently was no opportunity for conversation here. As in, “Governor, when you say you will act to repeal ‘Obamacare’, do you realize you would be making millions of workers and families uninsured once again?”

Thats not a bug, its a feature.

6 Charles Johnson  Wed, Jul 11, 2012 10:57:44am
7 HappyWarrior  Wed, Jul 11, 2012 10:58:24am
8 lawhawk  Wed, Jul 11, 2012 10:59:02am

The GOP will take what it wants out of the appearance - talking points that it already had concluded would happen, plus the belief that the GOP is simply superior to those in attendance at the NAACP - in terms of economic and social outlook.

It simply ignores that for all the talk of Romney and the GOP wanting to repeal the PPACA (Obamacare), the individual mandate was a GOP policy that it sought for the better part of two decades until Obama got it enacted. Now, the GOP hollers that it is: 1) unconstitutional (therefore assuming the position of trying to claim their very policies they sought to be enacted were unconstitutional); 2) wants to repeal the entirety of the act despite most people recognizing that it’s beneficial to them and would bring 30 more people access to insurance; and 3) Romney’s version was the base for the PPACA.

No one following the health care debate can argue with those two salient facts (though they will try), or the fact that Obama used one of McCain’s own ideas from the 2008 campaign in his health care plan:

Only in America could a Democratic president pass Mitt Romney’s health plan and fund it partly through John McCain’s best idea from the last campaign (taxing some employer provided plans) and be branded a “socialist.”

Read it all.

Instead, we’ve got GOPers claiming that they’ll have nothing to do with the PPACA - such as Perry in Texas, which has among the highest rates of uninsureds in the nation (nearly 25% uninsureds).

9 gwangung  Wed, Jul 11, 2012 10:59:15am

re: #6 Charles Johnson

[Embedded content]

Only really stupid white people would be taken in by that.

Hm. A lot of those out there….

10 HappyWarrior  Wed, Jul 11, 2012 11:00:11am

It’s hopeless really what the NAACP say. I’ve known many a right winger who see them as a black version of the KKK. Yeah, I know it’s insane.

11 Targetpractice  Wed, Jul 11, 2012 11:01:06am

re: #6 Charles Johnson

[Embedded content]

Ayep, they’re gonna play it up as “He tried to ‘open a dialogue,” or some such bullshit.

12 EastSider  Wed, Jul 11, 2012 11:02:02am

I’ve heard this pitch now a few times, that “the economy is bad for everyone” and then a run of demographic specific stats on how bad African Americans/college students/Latinos etc have had it “under” Obama. It has to be the thinnest tripe I’ve ever heard.

Let’s accept the premise anyway:

1) The economy was bad because of Bush-era policies. Most of the proposals today from the right are to re-instate or expand upon these policies, and I have not seen any credible reason for why they would work this time. (It reminds me of the “communism has never been tried in its ideal form” canard).

2) Republicans have spent the last 4 years fighting everything the President has tried to do. Much of that was programs designed to help the economy. If we’re really blaming Obama for the economy (and really, it boils down to him not fixing the economy fast enough, apparently), you have to look at the Republicans who have blocked most of the efforts to spur growth (and then took credit for programs where they did work).

3) Where republicans have taken power, they have not focused on the economy. They have pushed extreme social legislation that reflects positions of the power-holding far right.

13 GunstarGreen  Wed, Jul 11, 2012 11:05:37am

Standing in front of a crowd of people that directly benefit from the PPACA and giving a speech about how you intend to dismantle the PPACA is a pretty silly idea.

So of course it will be hailed as a heroic attempt to “cross the aisle” or whatever the “bipartisan” buzzword of the day is.

14 HappyWarrior  Wed, Jul 11, 2012 11:07:21am

Here’s what will happen. Fox News will play clips of Romney being booed and ignore the fact that Romney in fact got a standing ovation upon his entrance. The Fox pundits, Hannity, Bret Baier, etc will all use the booing to tell their moronic audience that the NAACP are nothing but water-carriers for the left and they will whine about black voters voting Democratic and use the tired line about how Lincoln was a Republican and how the Democrats were the racist party. The former of course is true but ignores the fact that the Republican party and the right went out of their way to alienate minority voters the second Nixon decided to embrace Strom Thurmond and the old segregationists. whom had been alienated by the Democratic Party’s moves to the left on race during the Kennedy and especially Johnson years.

15 allegro  Wed, Jul 11, 2012 11:08:05am

This is rather like giving a speech to an atheist conference and focusing on “teaching the controversy” and bringing back school prayer. Out of touch? Oh yes.

16 Randall Gross  Wed, Jul 11, 2012 11:08:13am

I’m betting that some of the same GOP diehards who were saying “Right on Joe!” during the “You LIE!” interruption of the State of the Union address will wax wroth about about this.

17 Targetpractice  Wed, Jul 11, 2012 11:11:28am

Think the last paragraph of this article says it best:

Romney Shouts Out Black Leaders In NAACP Speech, But Avoids Key Issues

Political observers on both sides of the aisle said Romney’s speech to the NAACP was likely more about convincing white suburban voters that he’s not racist than it was about actually reaching across the deep political divide that separates most of the black electorate from the Republican Party. But Romney seemed to make an effort — while still making clear why the divide exists in the first place.

18 EastSider  Wed, Jul 11, 2012 11:12:22am

The math is straightforward for this election.

Vote difference between candidates A and B = the following:

A’s base * (% of A’s base turning out)
B’s base * (% of B’s base turning out)
Swing Votes * (% of swing votes you win)

2012 will be a base/turnout election. This isn’t going to win Romney any swing votes, it’s not going to push down Obama’s turnout, but it is a sellable, sound-bitable clip of red meat that will help turn out the far right.

19 HappyWarrior  Wed, Jul 11, 2012 11:13:21am

I see he didn’t even bring up voting rights which is a big issue to the NAACP. Romney’s a buffoon. He as the one member said is totally out of touch with average Americans. I still remember his “advice” to students not doing well in school. “Borrow 20 grand from your parents and start your own business.” The moron should be grateful that Obama hatred is rampant enough for him to have a shot at being president.

20 Shiplord Kirel  Wed, Jul 11, 2012 11:13:23am

Worst nightmare: Some rickety powder keg will go off in the Middle East, gas prices will shoot up, the brainless masses will blame Obama, and Mitt will win.

Actually, there are two ways agitators of the brainless can exploit this: Blame Obama directly for gas prices (something over which he has very limited control), or accuse him of instigating the ME crisis in a “wag the dog” scenario. Of course, even if he were utterly evil and manipulative he would not start a war simply to commit political suicide. The target audience isn’t known for its cool analytical abilities however.

21 Randall Gross  Wed, Jul 11, 2012 11:14:57am

Some WaPo analysis - contrasting Romney’s speech and approach with McCain’s speech and approach.

[Link: www.washingtonpost.com…]

22 Kragar  Wed, Jul 11, 2012 11:14:57am

The entire purpose of this speech was so the Right could say “Romney went to speak in front of the NAACP, so why won’t Obama come speak in front of the Tea Party/NRA/Evangelicals?”

23 HappyWarrior  Wed, Jul 11, 2012 11:16:53am

re: #22 Kragar

The entire purpose of this speech was so the Right could say “Romney went to speak in front of the NAACP, so why won’t Obama come speak in front of the Tea Party/NRA/Evangelicals?”

Or why can’t there be a NAAWP or if they know that David Duke started a group with that name equate the two.

24 Feline Fearless Leader  Wed, Jul 11, 2012 11:18:57am

re: #20 Shiplord Kirel

Worst nightmare: Some rickety powder keg will go off in the Middle East, gas prices will shoot up, the brainless masses will blame Obama, and Mitt will win.

Actually, there are two ways agitators of the brainless can exploit this: Blame Obama directly for gas prices (something over which he has very limited control), or accuse him of instigating the ME crisis in a “wag the dog” scenario. Of course, even if he were utterly evil and manipulative he would not start a war simply to commit political suicide. The target audience isn’t known for its cool analytical abilities however.

But, but, if there’s a war, or war situation brewing, you don’t want to change your leadership right at the brink of dealing with it! At least if that leader is a REPUBLICAN.
///

25 Kronocide  Wed, Jul 11, 2012 11:19:16am

Any NAAWP would have to campaign against Fox News, which is holding white people (and the rest of us) back.

26 nines09  Wed, Jul 11, 2012 11:20:15am

re: #1 Kragar

Rush said this just showed how brave Romney was, and that it was brilliant because Romney just spoke over their heads to get his real message out.

Right.

Rush could blow chunks live on air and his listeners would agree. In fact I think he does that daily. I’ll give credit to the people in that room. They know bull shit when they hear it and a hack when they see one.

27 HappyWarrior  Wed, Jul 11, 2012 11:22:47am

I am amused to hear Romney complaining about Obama running a negative campaign. Has Mitt forgotten that he’s claimed that Obama pretty much never has had a real job because he’s spent much of his career in the public sector or that he continues to tout Donald Trump as a fundraiser. I think Mitt Romney is the kind of guy who thinks the rules should apply to everyone but him. His actions this campaign and throughout his life show him to be that kind of person.

28 Brother Holy Cruise Missile of Mild Acceptance  Wed, Jul 11, 2012 11:23:06am
29 Kragar  Wed, Jul 11, 2012 11:25:26am

AFA’s Buster Wilson Warns of ‘Pagan’ Rule, Reveals Membership in ‘Oath Keepers’

Wilson said he is a membership in the extremist group Oath Keepers and broadcasted the group’s ten conspiratorial “Orders We Will Not Obey,” based on warnings of potential concentration camps, looming dictatorships and foreign militaries in America. “For instance, I will not ever obey a law to help encamp Tupelo as a concentration camp, I will never obey a law as a law enforcement officer to take away your firearms, I will never obey a to do anything to take away your constitutional rights, I’m an oath keeper,” Wilson said:

Despite its benign language of defending and guarding the Constitution, Oath Keepers is actually a fringe group which has had a number of its local leaders arrested for various crimes and whose own founder backed the creation of militia groups and an alternative economy to “resist what the globalists have in store for us.”

30 bratwurst  Wed, Jul 11, 2012 11:26:12am
31 Targetpractice  Wed, Jul 11, 2012 11:26:17am

re: #28 Brother Holy Cruise Missile of Mild Acceptance

Romney Campaign admits speech was a photo-op

Which comes as a surprise to absolutely no one, if you listen to Rush’s belching as mentioned by Kragar above. This wasn’t Romney going to the NAACP and trying to win their vote, it was him making a stock speech to an audience of black people to claim that he’s an “inclusive president.”

32 dragonfire1981  Wed, Jul 11, 2012 11:29:05am

re: #28 Brother Holy Cruise Missile of Mild Acceptance

Romney Campaign admits speech was a photo-op

You’re not supposed to come out and say it you fools!

33 HappyWarrior  Wed, Jul 11, 2012 11:29:42am

re: #29 Kragar

AFA’s Buster Wilson Warns of ‘Pagan’ Rule, Reveals Membership in ‘Oath Keepers’

I wish they’d pick a narrative and stay with it. Either we’re having Shariah, mass secularism, or pagan rule. It can’t be all three at the same time. Oh and the Oathkeepers are a bunch of paranoid nutsos. “Won’t obay a law to encamp Tupelo into a concentration camp.” And these are the same people who dismissed anyone who criticized Bush’s policies as being anti American. Double standard dummies.

34 dragonfire1981  Wed, Jul 11, 2012 11:30:05am

re: #22 Kragar

The entire purpose of this speech was so the Right could say “Romney went to speak in front of the NAACP, so why won’t Obama come speak in front of the Tea Party/NRA/Evangelicals?”

“And now the Tea Party Patriots of Texas present President Barack Obama!”

*sound of guns cocking*

35 iossarian  Wed, Jul 11, 2012 11:30:18am

re: #28 Brother Holy Cruise Missile of Mild Acceptance

Romney Campaign admits speech was a photo-op

Here’s a tip. If you want your guy to look like he can be “President of the entire United States”, then try to have him not look like he’s deliberately being a dick to his hosts.

36 jaunte  Wed, Jul 11, 2012 11:31:33am

“You just can’t satisfy those people, and oh how I’ve tried!”

37 dragonfire1981  Wed, Jul 11, 2012 11:31:42am

re: #33 HappyWarrior

I wish they’d pick a narrative and stay with it. Either we’re having Shariah, mass secularism, or pagan rule. It can’t be all three at the same time. Oh and the Oathkeepers are a bunch of paranoid nutsos. “Won’t obay a law to encamp Tupelo into a concentration camp.” And these are the same people who dismissed anyone who criticized Bush’s policies as being anti American. Double standard dummies.

Remember, ANYTHING non-Christian equals Pagan. Islam, Buddhism, Shintoism, Atheism and of course Paganism is ALL represented under the umbrella of “Pagan”. Simple rule is: If Jesus has nothing to do with it it’s secular/pagan.

38 Kragar  Wed, Jul 11, 2012 11:31:49am

re: #33 HappyWarrior

I wish they’d pick a narrative and stay with it. Either we’re having Shariah, mass secularism, or pagan rule. It can’t be all three at the same time. Oh and the Oathkeepers are a bunch of paranoid nutsos. “Won’t obay a law to encamp Tupelo into a concentration camp.” And these are the same people who dismissed anyone who criticized Bush’s policies as being anti American. Double standard dummies.

Homosexual Pagan Sharia is the most dangerous form of Sharia.

39 GunstarGreen  Wed, Jul 11, 2012 11:33:16am

re: #33 HappyWarrior

I wish they’d pick a narrative and stay with it. Either we’re having Shariah, mass secularism, or pagan rule. It can’t be all three at the same time. Oh and the Oathkeepers are a bunch of paranoid nutsos. “Won’t obay a law to encamp Tupelo into a concentration camp.” And these are the same people who dismissed anyone who criticized Bush’s policies as being anti American. Double standard dummies.

They have a single narrative; it is that “Things That Are Not Christian Rule” are coming to usurp our Christian Nation.

What exactly those non-Christian things are is unimportant and varies from moment to moment, the salient point is that it is not God’s Law in God’s Country, thus horrible things will happen when we lose God’s Favor.

40 Kronocide  Wed, Jul 11, 2012 11:34:20am

re: #38 Kragar

Homosexual Pagan Sharia is the most dangerous form of Sharia.

Get Commie in there, DONE.

41 TedStriker  Wed, Jul 11, 2012 12:43:44pm

re: #6 Charles Johnson

[Embedded content]

Pretty much…at this point, any politicking or pandering Romney is doing with any groups that do not mainly consist of white males (the more affluent, the better) is just for show.

42 TedStriker  Wed, Jul 11, 2012 12:49:27pm

re: #22 Kragar

The entire purpose of this speech was so the Right could say “Romney went to speak in front of the NAACP, so why won’t Obama come speak in front of the Tea Party/NRA/Evangelicals?”

re: #34 dragonfire1981

“And now the Tea Party Patriots of Texas present President Barack Obama!”

*sound of guns cocking*

The reception that President Obama would get from some of those groups would rival or surpass Bart’s arrival in Rock Ridge in Blazing Saddles.

I think that President Obama could channel Cleavon Little in that situation very well…

43 Mozort  Wed, Jul 11, 2012 1:50:28pm

I was hoping he was going to pull a Bullworth.

44 Charles Johnson  Wed, Jul 11, 2012 2:03:51pm

re: #43 Mozort

I was hoping he was going to pull a Bullworth.

What’s a “Bullworth?”

45 Usually refered to as anyways  Wed, Jul 11, 2012 2:05:22pm

re: #44 Charles Johnson

What’s a “Bullworth?”

/ Bout $4lb

46 Mozort  Wed, Jul 11, 2012 2:28:44pm

My bad, it’s actually a Bulworth.

[Link: www.dailymotion.com…]

47 Patricia Kayden  Wed, Jul 11, 2012 3:01:55pm

That NAACP audience was much nicer/civil to Romney than a crowd of T’Baggers would be to President Obama.

I’m sure that Romney loved the booing since it played into his theme that he as a mega-millions rich dude, he knows what’s right for the poor Negroes. At one point in his speech, he actually said, “If you want a president who will make things better in the African-American community, you are looking at him.” I’d really like to hear the details of how he’s going to “make things better” for any community.

48 labman57  Wed, Jul 11, 2012 5:31:45pm

Mitt’s definition of “nonessential program” — any federal program which does not directly benefit major corporations or the ultra-wealthy.

49 SanFranciscoZionist  Wed, Jul 11, 2012 6:39:20pm

re: #37 dragonfire1981

Remember, ANYTHING non-Christian equals Pagan. Islam, Buddhism, Shintoism, Atheism and of course Paganism is ALL represented under the umbrella of “Pagan”. Simple rule is: If Jesus has nothing to do with it it’s secular/pagan.

Jabberwock actually explains this fairly well about Chick Tracts, and Slacktivist about the Left Behind Books. There is no such thing in this world as various religious beliefs or lack thereof, there is only acceptance of Evangelical Christianity, Wingnut Variant, ie, The Truth, or deliberate cold-blooded rejection of it. All of those who reject it are part of the same conspiracy against God.

Chick is quite interesting in this regard. He does ‘historical’ tracts that identify Catholicism, Islam, New Age groups, Satanists and atheists as all essentially being the same group—goddess worshipers who adore Semiramis.

50 JRCMYP  Wed, Jul 11, 2012 9:10:59pm

re: #6 Charles Johnson

[Embedded content]

That was exactly what I thought when I saw this clip. Gross.


This article has been archived.
Comments are closed.

Jump to top

Create a PageThis is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.
Or... you can just click this button to open the Pages posting window right away.
Last updated: 2023-04-04 11:11 am PDT
LGF User's Guide RSS Feeds

Help support Little Green Footballs!

Subscribe now for ad-free access!Register and sign in to a free LGF account before subscribing, and your ad-free access will be automatically enabled.

Donate with
PayPal
Cash.app
Recent PagesClick to refresh
Best of April 2024 Nothing new here but these are a look back at the a few good images from the past month. Despite the weather, I was quite pleased with several of them. These were taken with older lenses (made from the ...
William Lewis
Yesterday
Views: 125 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 4
Texas County at Center of Border Fight Is Overwhelmed by Migrant Deaths EAGLE PASS, Tex. - The undertaker lighted a cigarette and held it between his latex-gloved fingers as he stood over the bloated body bag lying in the bed of his battered pickup truck. The woman had been fished out ...
Cheechako
3 weeks ago
Views: 387 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 1