re: #1078 iceweasel

Not just the Holdren piece. This recent nonsense of claiming that there aren’t more threats to Obama, or that threats to Bush were underreported by the media, or that threats to Bush were not as vigorously pursued by the Secret service— because they weren’t reported by the media. Huh? If the Secret Service relies on the media for clues about who to investiagte we’re in deeper shit than I thought.

Without a statement from the Secret Service zombie has no basis whatsoever for making those claims. Although it’s difficult to tell exactly what claims zombie intends to make in those posts, because he changes his mind all the time.

Apparently zombie did good work at one point taking pictures of the fringe left and rallies. Good for him.

But these recent posts make it look less like zombie is interested in citizen journalism or exposing the fringe than in pushing a partisan agenda, and that’s a shame. The recent posts about Bush threats in particular. I fail to see the relevance of pointing out that the left went crazy over Bush— except as a way of somehow downplaying, justifying, or minimising the crazy happening on the right at the moment. It’s not 2002, 2004, or 2006 any more.

Lending credence to this Van Jones conspiracy stuff is just more evidence of that partisan agenda, in my opinion. And that’s a shame. I’d rather see someone who can point out the lunacy on both sides, and doesn’t develop a mysterious blind spot for only one.

IW … bullshit … and you have an agenda … it is clear … you do not fool me and you never have …