re: #93 palomino

I’ve heard that argument before, the “people can’t understand the intricate nature,” but what they do understand is when you say “Romney was CEO of Bain when it was cutting jobs, outsourcing them to China, and investing in a company that disposed of aborted fetuses.” The Romney campaign and its fellow travelers will argue that just because he was CEO doesn’t mean he was calling the shots, but that’s hair-splitting. He was the CEO, he was the sole stockholder, the buck stopped at his desk. That’s something anybody with a basic understanding of how a company works can understand.