re: #1114 Spare O’Lake

Your operating assumption appears to be that all knowledge revealed through the scientific method will certainly and inevitably conflict with all religious thought, which is something I cannot empirically know.

Advances in the physical sciences have given us a standard of living totally unthinkable to people just a few decades ago, and further advances occur at mind-boggling speed.
Science, however, can’t motivate people to moral behavior.
And religion can’t build spacecraft.
Religion, without science, has no brain.
Science, without religion, has no heart.