re: #119 subsailor68

So, in my possibly incorrect understanding, the main issue is - did she, or did she not - smother the infant? If she did, Virginia law says she smothered an infant who was defined as “alive”, and the fact that the investigator is incorrect on the law is irrelevant. She should be charged.

Am I missing something?

The fact that she wasn’t charged strongly suggests that the entire story is bogus, and that there was no evidence she “smothered the baby.”