re: #12 ludwigvanquixote

Lindzen is not a complete kook. He is someone with an alternative hypothesis to some effects that we are attributing to AGW. Most of the scientific community doubts his hypothesis. He has no real evidence to support it as yet.

I personally think he is wrong based on the science and so do many thousands of others of actual scientists.

What makes him a partial kook is is willingness to continue to accept money from espoused anti AGW cook organizations and to speak at their events. He is on the borderline of going over from scientist to advocate for the bad guys.

Is all his published papers peer reviewed?