re: #1473 Sharmuta

Unnamed sources have, in the past at LGF, been ridiculed. There is no reason to find this one any more credible than ones used against Bush or any other republican. Again- I think this time the difference is the desire to believe it.

Absolutely. Unnamed sources should always be mocked, ferociously. What we’re seeing here is the kind of reasoning that puts the D in derangement, as I said at 550 or whatever.