Always been much more of a fan of Sagan’s “Demon-Haunted World” than Dawkins. Not sure why — I think it’s because Sagan seems to offer a constructive alternative framework through which to examine all such arguments, and then lets folks make up their own minds on specific questions like evolution versus creationism. The end result is often the same, but Sagan seems less combative/didactic in his methods. Dawkins always read like he had a chip on his shoulder, but that’s probably just me.

en.wikipedia.org