re: #190 Jimbouie

There was a good example of Jones’s and Mann’s understanding of “peer review” when Climate Research published a paper skepitcal of their conclusions, Jones demanded that the journal “rid itself of this troublesome editor”, and Mann advised that “we have to stop considering Climate Research as a legitimate peer-reviewed journal. Perhaps we should encourage our colleagues in the climate research community to no longer submit to, or cite papers.”

This show me that they’ve been perfectly willing to use the peer review process to censor their critics.

What absolute crap! You didn’t even watch the video I posted, did you?

Hint: it shows that your claims are not only false, they’re pure propaganda with no relation whatsoever to reality.