re: #202 marjoriemoon

The point, however, that Charles made is the giant hypocrisy of someone, curiously a male someone, who would like the government to keep their paws of his body, but to hell with women’s bodies.

I’m not aware of anyone on the pro-life side whose position is “to hell with women’s bodies”. Most pro-lifers I’ve met think it’s very important for women to have control over their bodies, they just don’t think women should be able to arbitrarily choose to destroy a separate human body growing inside themselves.

I understand why you, Charles, and many others would disagree with that position. But please do not misrepresent that position as “women shouldn’t have control over their bodies”.