re: #23 fizziks

Wow, the reaction to this is incredible, and ridiculous.

At no point here did I claim that neo-Nazis and SJWs were the same or represented the same level of threat. I even said (highlighting for emphasis now):

LOL. No, you merely made a page called “Stormfront or SJW”.

So then the point was entirely missed that if you play the web game it is actually really difficult to tell the difference between far-left and Stormfront rhetoric. Did anyone actually follow the link and play the game?

I did. It consisted of:
1. some authentic sources;
2. some screenshots of anonymous comments of unknown provenance.

While there were some choice examples of bigotry there, It is not clear how the author of the “game” arrived at the conclusion that the screenshot quotes were made by SJWs. That is, unless he defined SJWs as “hateful cranks” in the first place, in which case it’s one big tautology.

If one defines SJWs as actually pursuing social justice (even if by annoying/misguided means), most of the quotes were NOT by SJWs. “Die cis scum” does not fall under any known def of social justice.

If you don’t think that represents a problem then say so, but nobody commenting negatively here took the time to address the main and salient point, the convergence of rhetoric.

Well, I did highlight your anti-Arab rhetoric which could have been written by a Stormfronter about Jews (or Arabs, for that matter). You chose not to comment on that.