re: #333 keloyd

Seems like he made his name in academia with the contrarian views of colonialism.
The counterfactual history stuff does seem interesting as a purely academic endeavour and intellectual exercise, tho wacky, but you can see why wingnuts might go for it in a big way— a bad way, and that makes me leery of him.

If he jumps ship from academia to hit the wingnut welfare route, and turning up at wingnut revisionist history ‘seminars’ that would suck— and who knows, he might.
(That’s my counterfactual future right there. Take that, Niall!)