Dan Riehl proves again that he’s in the running for the creepiest, most ugly-minded right wing blogger on the web, with a comment on his latest smear job (yes, he’s still at it):

I really don’t get where the Left is getting the homophobe nonsense from. a) he may have been gay b) he liked to spend a great deal of time around children. That’s atypical for all adult males. If he seemed stright, there’d be just as much reason to speculate as to his potential motivations.

Given the circumstances of his death, I think there’s at least some reason to speculate as to whether he got involved with someone who was a bit of a sicko. That someone may have also been gay, or perhaps bi-sexual, or omni-sexual, for all we know.

Being bound and restrained as he was, to a tree, not hung, could very well have been part of some sex game gone very bad, as he fell in with the wrong person - IE some nut.

That one investigator referenced the Carradine case caused me to wonder if there were signs of sexuial release from the autopsy. Yes, it could have been auto-erotic asphyxiation. But it could ahve been a kinky scene gone very bad after his satisfaction.

While there are not enough facts to prove anything, there is reason for this speculation, whether the Left, or his son, like it, or not.

No one is suggesting anything can be proven right now. But if they’re looking for a suspect, they might try Lexington, said to be home base for a homosexual community in the region.

More or less undergound communities do have a tendency to draw in some very bad people. Again, that’s just a fact. Not a judgment on homosexuals over all. Deal with it, queenie!! ; )

Posted by: Dan Riehl - Sunday, October 04, 2009 at 12:27 AM